Search for: All records

Monitoring glucose levels is critical for effective diabetes management. Continuous glucose monitoring devices estimate interstitial glucose levels and provide alerts for glycemic excursions. However, they are expensive and invasive. Therefore, low-cost, noninvasive alternatives are useful for patients with diabetes. In this article, we explore electrocardiogram signals as a potential alternative to detecting glycemic excursions by extracting intrabeat (beat-morphology) and inter-beat (heart rate variability) information. Unlike prior methods that focused only on the standard clinical excursion thresholds (70 mg/dL for hypoglycemia, 180 mg/dL for hyperglycemia), our proposed approach trains independent machine learning models at various excursion thresholds, aggregating their outputs for a final prediction. This allows learning morphological patterns in the neighborhood of the standard excursion thresholds. Our personalized fusion models achieve an AUC of 75 % for hypoglycemia and 78% for hyperglycemia detection across patients, resulting in an average improvement of 4 % compared to the baseline models (trained using only standard clinical thresholds) for detecting glycemic excursions. We also find that combining morphology and HRV information outperforms using them individually (5 % for hypoglycemia and 6 % for hyperglycemia). The data used in this article was collected from 12 patients with type-1 diabetes, each monitored over a 14-day period at Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston. The results indicate that a combination of morphological and HRV features is essential for noninvasive detection of glycemic excursions. Also, morphological changes can happen at varying glucose levels for different patients and capturing these changes provide valuable information that leads to improved prediction performance for detecting glycemic excursions. 

We present a multitask learning approach to the problem of hypoglycemia (HG) prediction in diabetes. The approach is based on a state-of-the-art time series forecasting model, N-BEATS, and extends it by adding a classification task so that the model performs both glucose forecasting (i.e., predicting future glucose values) and HG prediction (i.e., probability of future HG events sometime within the prediction horizon). We also propose an alternative loss function that penalizes forecasting errors in the HG range. We evaluate the approach on a dataset containing over 1.6M recordings from 112 patients with type 1 diabetes who wore a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) for 90 days. Our results show that the classification branch significantly outperforms the forecasting branch on the problem of HG prediction, and that the new loss function is more effective at reducing forecasting errors in the HG range than multi-task learning. 

Background: Monitoring glucose excursions is important in diabetes management. This can be achieved using continuous glucose monitors (CGMs). However, CGMs are expensive and invasive. Thus, alternative low-cost noninvasive wearable sensors capable of predicting glycemic excursions could be a game changer to manage diabetes. Methods: In this article, we explore two noninvasive sensor modalities, electrocardiograms (ECGs) and accelerometers, collected on five healthy participants over two weeks, to predict both hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic excursions. We extract 29 features encompassing heart rate variability features from the ECG, and time- and frequency-domain features from the accelerometer. We evaluated two machine-learning approaches to predict glycemic excursions: a classification model and a regression model. Results: The best model for both hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia detection was the regression model based on ECG and accelerometer data, yielding 76% sensitivity and specificity for hypoglycemia and 79% sensitivity and specificity for hyperglycemia. This had an improvement of 5% in sensitivity and specificity for both hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia when compared with using ECG data alone. Conclusions: Electrocardiogram is a promising alternative not only to detect hypoglycemia but also to predict hyperglycemia. Supplementing ECG data with contextual information from accelerometer data can improve glucose prediction.